Wednesday, 9 May 2018

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

Regular readers may recall the story of Dave and Sally (now former) longtime clients who ditched their Medical Mutual grandmothered plan for the (allegedly) greener pastures of a Health Care Sharing Ministry. As I told them last summer:

"Don’t blame you. I actually know someone who’s in one of these and is pretty happy with it."

So, fast forward 10 months, to yesterday:

"Medishare is not working out so well for us.  What are our healthcare insurance options?  I looked on Medical Mutual's site and it looked like they might not be offering individual policies anymore.  I'm hoping you have a good idea!! - Thanks, Sally"

Before I could reply, she followed up with a question about a plan she'd come across on-line. Well, actually, the plan came across her:

"Hi, I noticed that you were recently online looking for health insurance quotes. I have a much better way to obtain a low cost brand name major medical health insurance plan... with a low or zero net annual deductible!"

Wow, sounds great, and Sally wondered if I had access to it and what I thought of it.

Well, maybe, and I'm willing to take a look:

"United Healthcare currently has the best rates of any major medical carrier on their medically underwritten health plan. If you are in reasonably good health, this plan offers substantially better benefits at a much lower cost than any other health plan."

Oh, so a UHC plan. Okay, decent carrier, decent plans and prices in general, but no ObamaPlans, and this one sounds like a short term medical plan, which we do have access to and like. But then there's this:

"United Healthcare Major Medical Plan with Deductible Eliminator"

Hunh. I suppose one could call a Short Term plan "major medical," but that certainly implies a lot more than I would be comfortable with. But what's this "Deductible Eliminator?"

Ah:

"Deductible eliminator GAP supplement pays 100% of medical expenses subject to your deductible in the hospital, and 50% of expenses subject to your deductible on outpatient expenses."

Now that doesn't seem familiar, but maybe I missed a memo, so off to the UHC quoting site. Nope, no "Deductible Eliminator" here.

Hmmm, what to do now?

So, I reached out to my friends at Cornerstone, who took one look at the email and referred me to UHC's home office. They were quite puzzled as well, since they had no idea what this agent was pushing, but it certainly wasn't one of their products. I thanked them, and promised to keep them in the loop.

By this time, I'd received a follow-up email from Sally:

"I am going to use the sharing plan more effectively.  I found that if I lower our deductible from $10,000 to $7,500 our premium only goes up $18 a month! I'm thinking this is a better option that anything else right now."

Okay, I get that. But I took a chance and asked if she'd mind asking for more details on this "other" plan, and she readily agreed to do so. Here's what the other agent sent:

"Hi [Sally], Here is the info about the United Healthcare major medical plan plus another popular plan from a top selling carrier ... United Healthcare Term Major Medical Value Select A."

So, just as I had suspected: a short term medical plan. I'd like to think that her misrepresentation of it was a typo rather than intentional.

Seems like there's something missing though, no? Where's that fantastic (literally, apparently) "Deductible Eliminator?"

And something I think is even more appalling: the lack of disclosure that this is, in fact, a Short Term Medical plan and thus not ACA-compliant. This is critical for a number of reasons:
■ The plan doesn't cover pre-existing conditions
■ It leaves them subject to the fine/penalty/tax (which is a double whammy in this case, since they'd be coming from an ACA-compliant Sharing Ministry, which exempts them)
■ These plans aren't renewable, and currently have a 3 month maximum term
There's actually more, but we'll cover that in Part 2.

Stay tuned....


from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2FZDArI
via

Monday, 7 May 2018

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

Back in March, we reported that the IRS had decreased this year's maximum HSA contribution, limiting families to $6,850 for 2018. Well, the folks at Ballard Sphahr tip us that:

"The IRS has announced that it will restore the family deduction limit for HSA contributions to $6,900 for 2018."

Hey, $50 is $50.

I've long had an issue with tying one's credit score with one's auto and home insurance (I know, whistling in the dark), but what can you do?

Well, the folks at The Zebra (seriously!) have "received a U.S. patent for their proprietary Insurability Score™ ... a free, first-of-its-kind score which decodes for consumers what is affecting their individual insurance risk, by how much, and what they can do about it."

Score one for the little guy.

Great news from FoIB Holly R:

"Israeli scientists at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and Soroka University Medical Center in Beersheba announced that they have developed a new non-invasive method to detect early breast cancer more accurately, using commercially available breath and urine tests."

This seems significant, and potentially less expensive (and awkward) than current methods.

Over the years, we've blogged many times on so-called "Grandmothered" plans. I kinda liked that term, but it's a little unwieldy and not necessarily all that descriptive. Well, the good news is that I just learned a new term which solves that problem: "Keep What You Have (KWYH)" plans. Same concept, better descriptor.

The bad news is that it's about to become a moot point:

"After careful consideration, we will no longer offer Aetna and Coventry transitional relief plans (also known as Keep What You Have - KWYH - plans) after December 31, 2018. When we began offering KWYH plans four years ago, we did so understanding that these plans were to help ease the transition to Affordable Care Act (ACA) plans and not a permanent alternative."

/sigh


from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2HWeTlX
via

Friday, 4 May 2018

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

An apple a day keeps the doctor away. Old wives tale or truth?

The old saying dates back to 1866 according to Medical News Today.

Apple Watch hit the market 150 years later. And now it is crediting with saving the life of Deanna Rechtenwald of Tampa, FL.

18-year-old Deanna Recktenwald, of the Tampa area, was at an area church recently when her Apple Watch gave her a notification: her resting heart rate had reached 190 beats per minute, recommending that she seek medical attention. 
 Her mother, a registered nurse, then took her to a walk-in clinic, and later to an emergency room, where doctors gave her a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, for which she had expressed no previous symptoms. - Apple Insider

I have not worn a watch in years but am rethinking that decision. Who knew a gadget could be a lifesaver?

And speaking of apples (not Apples), did William Tell really exist and did he shoot an apple placed on his son's head? Smithsonian has the answer.


Maybe Isaac Newton didn't discover gravity while sitting under an apple tree.

Is it possible there is nothing more American than mom, apple pie and baseball?

Getting back on track.

Deanna's parents were so grateful for the Apple Watch warning they wrote Tim Cook to express their gratitude for the watch they feel saved their daughters life. Apparently this is not the first time the watch alerted the wearer to a medical emergency.

 A woman late last year used the Emergency SOS feature to summon police after a terrible car accident. And a man in New York, also in 2017, discovered a pulmonary embolism via HeartWatch, Men's Health reported.

InsureBlog is not compensated for this post. We just think it is a great story that needs to get out there.

#AppleWatch #TimCook #ChronicKidneyDisease #DeannaRechtenwald




from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2jtCCuM
via

Thursday, 3 May 2018

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

As in Disability Insurance Awareness Month:



from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2rjnMuD
via

Wednesday, 2 May 2018

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

So, last month we noted that New Hampshire was experimenting with a novel approach towards incentivizing price transparency. One of the challenges is that, absent skin in the game, a lot of folks just don't see the value, (or want to put in the effort). But Granite State employees now do have a reason to shop around:

"[A] school nurse who is covered through New Hampshire's state employee health plan, found that choosing a certain facility scored her a $50 check in the mail."

And the idea seems to be catching on:

"The Maine Right to Shop law begins by giving patients direct access to price information, enabling them to make informed decisions about costs of their care."

Actually, that's not true: it "requires health insurance companies offer plans that allow patients to shop for comparable services and provides incentive for them to peruse the healthcare market for treatment that best fits their budget." Plus, whatever savings are realized are split between the carrier and the insured.

This also has potential:

"[A] third key feature of the Maine law allows out-of-network providers to compete for patients on a level playing field ... you can see any provider you want out of network, as long as they are lower-cost."

I like the concept of this approach, but I wonder how carriers will be able to process these kinds of claims. That is, whatever is saved on care may be eaten up by admin costs (and thus) higher premiums. And I'm not the only skeptic:

"Until providers are incentivized to compete for patients based on both the cost and quality of care, the massive waste of resources produced by this predictable market failure is unlikely to be remediated."

Long time readers will recall that I've always been a fan of the 58-state laboratory model, so I'm very interested in seeing how this works out.

[Hat Tip: David Whelan]


from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2JNZctx
via

Tuesday, 1 May 2018

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

Shot:

"ObamaCare Could be Driving People to Drink, Study Finds"

The study apparently found a strong correlation between the effects of ObamaCare and increased alcohol consumption.

Which is hardly surprising, really.

[Hat Tip: Ace of Spades]

Chaser:

"Georgia doctor allegedly threatened to 'slit' employees' throats, 'cut' worker's head off, 'roll it down hallway'"

In case you were wondering, it's R45.6.


from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2HHBApE
via

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

We've blogged before about the blatant sexual discrimination inherent in the ObamaTax's EHB (Essential Health Benefits) schedule:

"So for all this talk about covering birth control convenience items and mammograms (to name but two), there is no corresponding requirement to cover, say, prostate exams or even STD screening for XY'ers."

This includes, by the way, male birth control items.

But in some state, that's changed. The folks at UnitedHealthcare inform us that:

"The IRS knows that several states have recently adopted laws that require certain health insurance policies and arrangements to provide benefits for male sterilization or male contraceptives without cost sharing [eg "free"]."

This was news to me (also, anyone know which states these would be? Apparently my google-fu is lacking today).

In the event, this created a problem for folks who had (what they thought were) HSA-compliant plans:

"A plan that provides male sterilization and male contraceptive benefits without cost sharing or with a deductible lower than required under Section 223, is not an HDHP, even if the coverage is required by a state." [emphasis added]

Which means that if you're fortunate(?) enough to live in one of these states, and own such a policy, you're prohibited from contributing to your HSA.

Ouch!

The good news is that the Bueauweenies in DC
© have graciously consented to (temporarily) waive that restriction, at least until 2020.

What would be even better would be to require that the ACA actually conform to the 4th Amendment, and either add male contraceptive (and other male-specific) coverage, or do away with such cover add male contraceptive (and other male-specific) coverage, or do away with such cover altogether.

Hey, a boy can dream, no?


from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2HGhhwK
via