Wednesday, 31 July 2019

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

Suzy, a referral from another client, called me last Friday, asking to set up an appointment to discuss health insurance. We agreed on yesterday afternoon (July 30), and boy did we luck out with that.

First, the backstory:

Suzy's divorce was finalized last November, and it appears that her divorce decree did not require her ex-husband to continue her insurance. So she called his employer to find out about COBRA (it's a fairly large company) and was told that they were in the midst of some kind of audit, but were able to tell her how much the premiums would be ($700+/month - Yikes). They also told her they'd be in touch with the paperwork.

That never happened.

But her medical bills kept being covered, so no harm, no foul, and no $700 a month out of her bank account.

Until early June, when her doc called to say that [insurance company had denied the latest claim because she no longer had insurance with them.

Oy.

So she called to find out the story, and as best she could tell, her ex- had neglected to formally tell HR that they were divorced, and apparently hadn't realized they were still dinging his paycheck for her coverage. Eventually, he connected the dots and off she went at the end of May.

Except that neither his employer nor the insurance company had bothered to tell her. So she called HR (several times) and was told they'd send her COBRA paperwork ASAP.

It was at the point of the initial call in early June that the clock started ticking for the employer:

"An employer that is subject to COBRA requirements is required to notify its group health plan administrator within 30 days ... Within 14 days of that notification, the plan administrator is required to notify the individual of his or her COBRA rights."

So basically that's 44 days,  which in this case was July 15th.

Remember I told you the July 30th date would be important?

Well, it's also relevant for another meter that started running June 1: the ACA Special Open Enrollment clock. That is, losing group coverage constitutes a triggering event for Special Open Enrollment, but one must exercise that option within 60 days. Which would have been .... today.

Whew!

So now we have some issues and challenges: first, since she's never received any COBRA paperwork, it appears she's the subject of a severe COBRA violation, which doesn't bode well for her ex-husband's employer. We decided to table that for the nonce, since our primary concern was getting her covered. To that end we had several choices:

An ACA plan (for which she is not subsidy-eligible), a Short Term Medical plan, or "Dave's Plan." We got online and started looking at ACA plans. As expected, they were pricey, and since she is in good health, the guaranteed issue and pre-ex features weren't all that critical.

For a number of reasons I wasn't too thrilled with the STM plan options.

Then I had her read our post on Dave's Plan, and we actually got to speak with him during this process. He had an online presentation for her, and they agreed (as did I) that this plan was the best fit for her needs. The "catch" is that, since it's underwritten it will take a few days to confirm enrollment and there's always the (very slight) chance that she'd be turned down. Dave (an experienced insurance pro himself) and I agreed that Suzy should also "pull the trigger" on an ACA plan just in case.

So we did that, and then saw that the plan would be effective August 1, 2019.

Wait, what?

My understanding has always been that:

"When you sign up 1-15 you are not covered until the First of the following month. From the 16-31st the plan starts the 1st of the second month"

And since we were signing up on the 30th, how is that even possible?

Now, it's not that big of a deal in this case, since we probably won't even need the plan, but I'd sure love to know how that happened.

Oh, and the COBRA violation? Well, COBRA is jointly enforced by the IRS, the DOL and CMS, and penalties for violating its requirements include:

• Excise tax penalties of $100 per day ($200 if more than one family member is affected)
• Statutory penalties of up to $110 per day under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
• Civil lawsuits
• Attorneys' fees and interest

Once the dust has settled on Suzy's new coverage, we'll be contacting DOL to get that ball rolling.
 
A long day, indeed.


from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2YmUv5L
via

Tuesday, 30 July 2019

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america



from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2KcA0hX
via

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

This is indeed a poser:

"Judge rules Denver man who 'killed his wife' can use up to $500,000 from her life insurance to pay for his defense"

As we've noted before, folks who commit crimes (such as murdering their spouse or children) are generally not allowed to profit from that action. For example:

"California dad charged with insurance fraud after he drove off cliff, killing autistic sons"

The idea is that to allow folks to benefit from their crimes would be against the public good. Thus, convicted murders aren't allowed to profit from the sale of their autobiographies, or receive life insurance proceeds from the policy of their now-deceased dependents (whom they caused to be deceased).

Except:

"... the higher court ruled that the statute does not to apply to a third party - in this case a legal defense team - that is paid for a 'legally enforceable obligation"

That's because the accused is entitled to the "presumption of innocence."

Which actually makes sense: notice that in my example above, I referred to the convicted murderer. But in this case, the accused is just that: accused, not (yet?) convicted. My question would be: okay, but what if he's ultimately found guilty? Does he have to repay it?

And how?

[Hat Tip: NDH]


from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2GAf43C
via

Monday, 29 July 2019

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

From FoIB Holly R:

Eticovo, is a "biosimilar" med for the dreaded condition, which is "an autoimmune disease in which the body’s immune system ... mistakenly attacks the joints." This usually leads to major pain and mobility issues, so the increased availability of an affordable treatment option is most welcome.

Related (sorta):


Beyond the obvious things like flue shots and doc visits, sunscreen and even contact lens solution can be run through your account.

Caveat: Once you've used funds for trivial expenses, you may be hard-pressed to come up with the scratch if something serious arises.


from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2KarsIp
via

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

Last week, we talked about appeals bonds; today we're treated to an interview with Mutual of Omaha's Demerri Bond, who manages the company's long-term care insurance underwriting team. Before joining MoO some 20 years ago, she was actually a long-term care nurse.

Wow.

Here she is explaining some of the ins-and-outs of underwriting long-term care plans:



[Special IB Thanks to MoO's Allen Gregoire]


from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2Gwuy8v
via

Friday, 26 July 2019

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america



Yesterday, we reviewed the ramifications of Oberlin College's courthouse loss to Gibson Bakery, to the tune of some $36 million. With which, it appears, Oberlin is loathe to part.

Understandable.

So during the appeals process, the clock continues to tick on the award, to the tune of $4,000 a day.

Yikes.

As we noted, this could very easily lead the college to an even more dire financial situation, and the Gibson's are (also understandably) concerned about there being anything left to collect.

In such cases, one is required to post a bond to 'insure' against that eventuality, but Oberlin officials requested to be relieved of that burden.

Turns out, Judge Judge John Miraldi was having none of that:
"After considering the Parties respective briefs, the attached exhibits, and applicable precedent the Court hereby orders that the judgment is stayed, as of the date of this entry, subject to the following conditions ... Within seven (7) days, Defendants shall post a bond in the amount of $36,367,711.56."
Failure to comply would trigger the required payment of the total award.

Of course now comes the 'fun' part: actually securing said bond. As we noted yesterday, this will likely require Oberlin to put some (all?) of its endowment, and perhaps other physical assets, "on the line."

One almost feels sorry for its erstwhile students.


from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2OnFUCc
via

Thursday, 25 July 2019

Insurance Tips and trik auto insurance, auto insurance quotes, auto insurance companies, auto insurance florida, auto insurance quotes online, auto insurance america

Readers may recall our post last month regarding the plight of Oberlin College in Ohio. At the time, they had just lost a lawsuit brought against them by a local bakery that the college had apparently victimized. As we noted at the time, the institution's insurers may balk at covering it at all:

"[I]t appears that the insurer, Lexington Insurance Company, is likely to disclaim coverage for the intentional torts which gave rise to the verdict."

But wait, it gets better (well, for certain values of "better"):

"Will Oberlin College be able to secure a bond? Probably, but it might not be as easy as you would think."

What's this about a bond, you ask?

Well, as expected, the college is appealing the rather large judgment; the challenge is that such appeals take a while, and the interest alone on that sum is over $4,000 a day. The Gibson family is concerned that Oberlin might metaphorically "bleed out" and have nothing on which they can collect:

In Ohio, folks (and institutions) that wish to appeal an award are free to do so, but must post a bond which essentially guarantees that the amount will be paid if the appeal is lost. It's important to note that, as our good friend and guru of P&C Bill M points out, a bond is not an insurance policy, but a 'financial instrument.'

Okay, so what?

Well, in the post we excerpted above, it's claimed that the carriers "writing these appeal bonds want to take zero risk."

Which is kind of the anti-thesis of insurance, which is acknowledging and underwriting for a specific risk. In this case, the carrier(s) will want to have some pretty substantial collateral to back up their guarantee of such a large sum. This could be in the form of cash (as in the school's endowment), and/or buildings and equipment. The point is that, unlike a typical insurance policy, these plans are not risk-based.

That may yet prove to be critical.

[Special IB thanks to Bill M for taking the time to help us understand this]


from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2SEAguc
via