#1: Golden State heads' up:
We previously covered this at the beginning of this year, when California "enacted legislation that permanently establishes different enrollment dates within the state, both on and off-exchange."
Hunh.
#2: Across the Pond, the Much Vaunted National Health Service© continues swirling:
As we've long noted, this is a fuatire, not a bug.
#Mediciad4All
#3: Finally, as we wait for final numbers from Open Enrollment v7.0, this interesting observation from FoIB (and actuary) Greg Fann:
Californians Without Health Insurance Will Pay A Penalty — Or Not 🤔https://t.co/iqNtoEsHGy— Steve Downey (@DowneyInsSvc) December 16, 2019
"Californians must have health insurance starting next year or face a HEFTY tax penalty. But..."#California #Healthcare #Obamacare pic.twitter.com/MNMlW1Gd44
We previously covered this at the beginning of this year, when California "enacted legislation that permanently establishes different enrollment dates within the state, both on and off-exchange."
Hunh.
#2: Across the Pond, the Much Vaunted National Health Service© continues swirling:
"Nearly half of [NHS] cancer patients in Wolverhampton are being kept waiting to start treatment for longer than the recommended two months." https://t.co/2gt5NuzbXC— AssocAmerPhys&Surg (@AAPSonline) December 15, 2019
As we've long noted, this is a fuatire, not a bug.
#Mediciad4All
#3: Finally, as we wait for final numbers from Open Enrollment v7.0, this interesting observation from FoIB (and actuary) Greg Fann:
Only 1 of the 3 ACA individual market population groups has had an enrollment increase from 2017-2020, and it did so in the two years that outreach funding declined. We need to concern ourselves with other aspects that drive enrollment results. https://t.co/Vi1plXTIxU— Greg Fann (@greg_fann) December 3, 2019
from InsureBlog https://ift.tt/2PPbWom
via
No comments:
Post a Comment